Provar a negação

clip­ped from www.prospect-magazine.co.uk

No self-respecting theist would go so far as to claim that “you can­not prove the non-existence of God” entails “God exists.” As men­ti­o­ned, their point is merely to leave open the pos­si­bi­lity that such a being might exist. But Sagan’s dra­gon dashes even this hope. For one can show that it is absurd, irra­ti­o­nal, intel­lec­tu­ally irres­pon­si­ble or even luna­tic to beli­eve that fai­ries, goblins, the Norse gods, the Hindu gods, the gods of early Judaism (yes, there were seve­ral: go check), and so endles­sly on, “might exist.” It would com­pound the felony a mil­li­on­fold to grant this and yet insist that one’s own (Chris­tian or Mus­lim, say) deity “neverthe­less” exists or might exist.


For a sim­ple case of pro­ving a nega­tive, by the way, con­si­der how you prove the absence of pen­nies in a piggy-bank.
  blog it
Par­ti­lhar este artigo:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr

Outros arti­gos idênticos:

  1. Resu­mindo
  2. de-conversion
  3. Pres­su­pos­tos
  4. Com­pras de domingo

07. Junho 2008 by Helder Sanches
Categories: Diversos | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *

*